Parties Warn of ‘Fringe Candidates’: Montgomery News Conference Breaks into a Shouting Match
By Chris Spolar
Washington Post Staff Writer
A bipartisan Montgomery County news conference held yesterday to discuss “fringe
candidates” in the Sept. 9 primary erupted into a shouting match when a handful
of candidates rebuked the Democratic and Republican leaders for raising religion
as an issue in the election and labeling their beliefs as “cults.”
“This is unprecedented that the Republican and Democratic parties would get together
and have a ‘savage feast,’ ” to denounce primary candidates, said John E. Boehm,
a Democratic congressional candidate who is a follower of political extremist Lyndon
H. LaRouche Jr.
Boehm’s remarks were directed at Republican Central Committee Chairman Albert Bullock
and Democratic Central Committee Chairman Jay Bernstein, who said they called the
news conference to encourage voters to come out for the primary and to talk about
their concerns that candidates linked to radical or religious groups could take
control of the parties.
Eleven candidates who are affiliated with LaRouche are running for state or local
office. Twelve members of the Great Commission Church and seven members of the Damascus
Community Church, fundamentalist congregations in Montgomery County, also are running
for local office.
Both party leaders were careful not to name candidates, but Bernstein emphasized
the political concept of the separation of church and state. “The views of a fundamentalist
movement has no place in the political process,” he said.
Bullock, by contrast, said that “fundamentalists and religious right groups” are
important to the Republican Party, but later added that “no one had the right to
threaten the integrity of the political process by using deceptive campaign tactics
or religious intolerance.”
Bernstein, a candidate for County Council, said he organized the news conference
because the Montgomery Democratic Party “does not want … [what] occurred in Illinois.”
Supporters of LaRouche won Democratic primary races for lieutenant governor and
secretary of state there in March.
Bernstein also invited a representative of the Cult Awareness Network, a nonprofit
group that monitors what it considers cults, to speak. Nancy Howell, president of
a chapter of the group, charged that LaRouche’s National Labor Caucus and Great
Commission International, a nonprofit religious organization with a congregation
in Silver Spring, are groups that have “cultic” natures. Her statements were derided
by supporters of both groups.
Robert Highland Jr., a candidate for the Republican Central Committee who is a member
of the Damascus congregation, said, “Their self interest is to keep themselves in
office.”
Tom Short, a member of the board of trustees of the Great Commission congregation,
said he believed his church had been unfairly “labeled as a cult by innuendo. In
reality, all of the allegations … are untrue.”
GCx Web Library
Resources on the Great Commission church movement
aka Great Commission Churches, Great Commission Ministries, Great Commission Association of Churches, Great Commission International, Great Commission Students, The Blitz Movement
Resources on the Great Commission church movement
aka Great Commission Churches, Great Commission Ministries, Great Commission Association of Churches, Great Commission International, Great Commission Students, The Blitz Movement
The Washington Post, August 30th, 1986