The Mysterious Citizen
On Sale Now
American businessman Jim McCotter arrived in Christchurch in November 2000. Within
14 months, he'd set up a media group, bought ailing regional station Canterbury
Television, registered 14 new media-related companies and launched newspaper and
a weekly magazine. NICOLA SHEPHEARD asks if McCotter's embryonic media stable represents
a serious challenge to media giants Independent News Limited (INL) and Wilson &
Horton? What is McCotter's game-plan and does his religious-right background hold
any clues?
Media watchers were perplexed by the arrival, in July 2001, of a new southern newspaper
the Christchurch Citizen. Why start a newspaper in New Zealand when the only two
new tabloids of the last decade each folded within a year of launching? Why do it
in Christchurch when in late 1991 the Christchurch Star, once a robust competitor
to the Christchurch Press, had to restyle itself as a twice-weekly give-away to
survive?
When Christchurch letter-boxes were already jammed with at least seven other community
papers? One media-watcher gave the newcomer three months -- depending on the depth
of its owner's pockets.
But neither James (Jim) Douglas McCotter, 57, nor fellow American and business partner
Geoff Botkin were fazed. Nor were the more than 40 New Zealand staff recruited early
in 2001 to produce the paper. Seven months on from launching, despite all expectations,
the Christchurch Citizen is still there.
It's even gained a sister publication, magazine ES: Entertainment And Style, born
January 2002. Canterbury Television (CTV), the station purchased by McCotter in
March 2001, continues with much the same programming as it ran under its former owner,
Christchurch millionaire engineer and knowledge economy investor Dennis Chapman.
On the face of it, Jim McCotter, mystery American, seems to have defied the odds
and proved the gainsayers wrong. It could seem his newspaper has high hopes of playing
David to media Goliaths Independent Newspapers Limited (INL) -- owner of the Press
-- and Wilson & Horton -- owner of the Star and five community give-aways. INL and
Wilson & Horton between them dominate the New Zealandnewspaper industry.
But scratch the surface just a little and you'll find figures that don't seem to
add up to a commerciallyviable operation and many unanswered questions about the
business strategy behind the Citizen andMcCotter's other ventures. You'll also find
large staff turnover: personnel lists show 26 out of 58 staff disappeared off the
payroll between September 2001 and February 2002 and of the 17 editorial staffworking
a week after the launch, only seven remain. In January and February 2002, while
this story was being researched, Geoff Botkin resigned as CEO of McCotter's New Zealand
Media Group, one-time model agency boss Denyse Saunders quit as editor of ES, and
two more editorial staff on the Citizenhanded in their resignations. Jim McCotter
left Christchurch in December 2001 for the United States, and he hasn't been sighted
in New Zealand since.
A potted history of the paper shows there's a whole lot more to this Citizen than
meets the eye.
On the morning of July 25 2001, Christchurch residents were delivered -- that day
for free -- a new thrice-weekly (Monday, Wednesday and Saturday) newspaper to digest
with breakfast. The then Citizen Today looked very different from the city's only
surviving six-day newspaper the Press. It was smaller -- tabloid sized -- and both
front and back pages were almost entirely taken up with pictures. Flicking through
its 40 pages, readers found the standard sections: local, national and world news,
business, entertainment and sports. Most of the national and all the international
copy came from news agencies as is common in smaller New Zealand newspapers. The
layout was modern and breezy -- plenty of pictures, lots of colour.
In his inaugural editorial, editor Coen Lammers argued the case for another Christchurch
newspaper, invoking high-sounding principles of press freedom: "We believe responsible
local reporting is critically important for the order and progress of every free
society, and we intend for our journalistic contribution to make a difference for
the better."
Newstalk ZB talkback host Mike Yardley recalls the launch "went very well", judging
by what his callers were saying. Most early reaction was positive: people liked
the smaller size, the number and quality of photos. Others weren't so impressed.
Onetime newspaperman, now head of mass communication and journalism at the University
of Canterbury, Jim Tully, says he thought the new paper had "serious shortcomings
journalistically in content, editorial direction and format". He was also concerned
about "the heavy reliance on Reuters [international news wire] for a paper that editorialised
about presenting an alternative view." Nor, in Tully's view, did the local coverage
stand out much from the Press.
Tully had been approached by Geoff Botkin in March 2001, and invited to become a
consultant for the publication. He declined, envisaging "enormous problems in launching
a viable newspaper in a city the size of Christchurch in which both INL and Wilson
& Horton are major players".
Neither the Press nor the Star devoted much space to their latest rival, save for
a May 25 2001 Press article that reported McCotter and Botkin had "extreme right-wing
and religious connections."
Press editor Paul Thompson told North & South in late December 2001: "Our coverage
of the Citizen has been minimal because we haven't seen it as particularly newsworthy".
Thompson was wary of getting "introverted" and focussing on media stories which have
little general appeal.
While the Citizen was announcing its birth, the Press was ticking up 140 years of
business. Since the late 1990s, the Press has been, in Thompson's words, "refreshing
itself vigorously" and recent makeovers include expanded features and new special-interest
sections. At the time of the Citizen's birth, audited circulation figures for the
Press stood at 91,003. An AC Nielsen 2001 media survey showed total South Island
weekly Press readership as 405,000 -- with Canterbury at 322,000. (Canterbury has
481,431 residents.)
Coen Lammers was originally hired as assistant editor at the Citizen, but took over
from founding editor Grant Mealing in June 2001 when Mealing stepped aside for health
reasons to become news editor.
Mealing, who had suffered depression, subsequently committed suicide in January
2002. His wife Chris still works as a receptionist in the paper's Manchester Street
building.
Mealing and chief reporter Bryn Somerville both left jobs at the Press to join the
Citizen. Two other former Citizen reporters, Phil McCarthy and Kris Herbert, say
the involvement of such experienced, respected journalists helped inspire confidence
in joining the venture. Former Citizen senior publications manager Gary Anderson
-- now working for Circular Distributors Limited -- brought to his role a three-decade
print background including turning The Picton Paper from a loss-maker to a profitable
Marlborough newspaper in the 1980s.
After several free letterbox drops in randomly-selected streets, readers could buy
the Citizen for 50 cents an issue at various dairies, supermarkets, petrol stations,
and bookshops around town. The tabloid made a bold central city entrance at the
busy intersection of Manchester, High and Lichfield streets.
Painted in big blue letters across the office block housing the newspaper appeared
the words: "The Citizen, The Christchurch Paper." No escaping it: there was a new
kid on the block.
The atmosphere buzzed in the second-storey newsroom during those early weeks. Speaking
to North & South in his Somerfield backyard, on a sunny Christchureh Sunday in January,
two months after he resigned from the Citizen, Coen Lamrners recalls camaraderie
quickly grew among editorial staff. Dutch-born Lammers, 34, has the no-nonsense
candidness you'd expect from a man who has worked in daily journalism in Holland,
Australia and New Zealand and his sense of injury is unmistakable as he relates
his experience with the paper.
He left a job as production editor for The Australian in Sydney to join the Citizen.
Why leave that for an infant Christehurch tabloid? The chance to live in New Zealand
again (his wife is a New Zealander), and "the challenge of starting up a newspaper
from scratch. For a journalist it's a once in a lifetime opportunity, no one [starts
a new paper] these days," says Lammers.
After Mealing moved to news editor, Lammers had six weeks and an editorial staff
of 13 to produce the first issue. "It was just ridiculous." Still, they did it.
Four more staff joined the editorial department in the first week of publication.
But, says Lammers, "it all changed the moment McCotter landed".
Early in August, the company director, who had made several trips back and forth
between the US and New Zealand, returned to Christchureh, and started spending time
in the newsroom. Lammers' words trip over each other as he describes his wrangling
with McCotter over editorial control. "Headlines that he wanted, wordings he wanted
to use, stories that he wanted... He tried to get involved in all sorts of details,
mainly [to do with] the look."
Botkin, too, advised on coverage of certain issues, such as Christchurch Central
MP Tim Barnett's prostitution reform bill. "I got a bit of a sick feeling about
the whole thing," says Lammers, "when [McCotter] started telling me what stories
they wanted -- basically stories I didn't agree with and I'd try to stop it as much
as I could, or mould it into a way that was acceptable." Granted, Laminers says,
management had taken a hand in editorial direction on other papers where he'd worked,
but only at a more strategic, less detailed level. However, other comments suggest
McCotter's influence with other media holdings in the US has never been all pervasive.
During the build-up to the October 2001 local body elections, Lammers resisted McCotter's
push to back mayoral candidate and local media personality George Balani "all the
way", because of the likely -- and eventual -- victory of the presiding mayor, Gary
Moore. Another time he dissuaded McCotter from printing a psalm in every issue, knowing
this wouldn't go down well with a Christchurch audience.
McCotter also switched the order of news: from mid-August to mid-October, the world
news came at the front, then national and local. Lammers says McCotter's reasons,
some of which he accepted, included the initial weakness of local coverage by the
team of young reporters, many from out of town, and the need to distinguish the paper
from community give-aways. The re-ordering seemed odd, considering the Citizen's
attempts to market itself as an essentially Christchurch paper.
The inconsistent tone of the paper in its first few months bore the marks of this
editorial tension. Some aticles espoused viewpoints and angles far removed from
a religious-right stance, and the first story on the prostitution reform bill, which
proposes decriminalising sex work, covered all sides of the issue.
However, of the following eight articles and one editorial published on the topic
over the next two months, all but two centred on arguments against the bill.
More changes were in store. The original advertising sales staff left after their
salaries were abruptly switched to commissions. In October, Anderson quit as senior
publications manager after eight months in the job. (He is bound by a confidentiality
agreement with NZMG, so was unable to comment on his resignation. He did say of his
new job: "I have now found a company which respects its employees... and can
be relied
upon to adopt good business practices".)
Then in late November, staff learnt NZMG would contract out all editorial content
for the NZMG media outlets, including the Citizen and CTV, to a new company, New
Zealand News Network. Citizen journalists would be technically made redundant and
some offered new contracts with NZNN. One of New Zealand News Network's company directors
and its editor-in-chief is Jim McCotter's English son-in-law, Jonathan
Hunt, formerly
European bureau chief for Rupert Murdoch's Sky News. Hunt arrived in Christchurch
with his wife, McCotter's daughter Shannon, in October 2001.
In the next two weeks, chief reporter Bryn Somerville and another reporter left.
Editorial staff were sufficiently concerned about the terms of their new contracts
to seek advice from their union, the Engineering, Printing and Manufacturing Union.
The contracts defined them as contractors rather than employees. As such, they would
lose standard employee rights and protections like holiday and sickness day and
guaranteed hours of work, and would be essentially barred from freelancing for competitors
in the same market.
Four reporters authorised a union representative to call McCotter on their behalf
and request time to consider the contract. One meeting with management and three
days later, three of the four found their contract offers withdrawn. By February,
Lammers counts only seven from the August editorial staff of 17 still with the paper.
According to new editor-in-chief Jonathan Hunt the restructuring was simply improving
the paper. In a January interview, Hunt said, "We looked at the staff and kept the
ones who were talented and could take the organisation forward, and parted company
with some who weren't up to scratch." Dressed in a fashionably-cut dark suit, Hunt
emanated an unassailable confidence. He dismissed suggestions of staff unease over
the restructuring -- "Our staff seemed perfectly happy."
The NZMG code of administration, listed on its web site (www.nzmg.co.nz), includes
the following: "NZMG values... professional ethics and the wellbeing of our staff
and their families... It is our goal to demonstrate that media operations which
respect decency, integrity and community can and will be successful." Links take
you to three articles on corporate ethics by former CEO Botkin. When North & South
suggested to Botkin that some former staff do not feel their "wellbeing" was valued
by NZMG during the restructuring, he said it was inappropriate for him to comment,
as he was no longer with the company.
Lammers was dismissed as editor and offered a new contract with NZNN for what he
describes as a "nondescript job" that would have meant a pay cut of about 35 per
cent. In the Saturday November 24 2001 issue of the Citizen, the first without Lammers
at the helm, the paper launched what Lammers calls a "full frontal attack" on the
Press. It centred on the previous Thursday's front-page coverage in the Press of
the police shooting of Motueka man Jason Williams.
The November 22 Press's main headline read: "Police shoot grieving dad", and the
story opened: "The man shot and seriously wounded yesterday by police after a chase
in Canterbury was the grieving father of a five-year-old girl who died three weeks
ago in a Granity house fire." The shooting, the story said, followed a suspected
hostage-taking and a police chase from the North Canterbury town of Rangiora.
Directly before the shooting, Williams had "allegedly approached police brandishing
a machete."
Across the bottom of the front page was an article headlined "Police have shot 28
in the last 50 years."
Finally, down the right hand side, ran a single-column story: "Officers aim to save
life in crisis."
Reader reaction was heated and the paper's November 23 editorial headed "The wrong
impression" was openly placatory. "Some readers of The Press were clearly unhappy
at the headline over yesterday's front-page coverage of the [Williams] incident.
That was apparent from the many telephone calls and other messages received by the
newspaper... In this case our headline did give a wrong impression about the police
handling of the incident. In no way was it intended to indicate criticism of the
action taken by the police."
Certainly, the headlines on that day's front page -- "Shot man's chilling threats"
and "No surprise, says former partner" -- gave rather different "impressions". But
the Citizen was not so easily pacified. Here was a chance to capture the moral high
ground. On Saturday November 24, the Citizen ran a scathing page three article,
"Press won't say sorry". It began: "The Press newspaper has refused to apologise
for its 'sensationalist' coverage of the police shooting... City residents and the
police were outraged by Thursday's Press headline which appeared to accuse officers
of overreacting." It quoted three "furious Christchurch residents" and a Newstalk
ZB source who said more than half the calls received on the talkback show that Thursday
morning were about the Williams stories. "In an extraordinary admission," the unnamed
reporter finished, "Press editor Paul Thompson told the Citizen he accepts Thursday's
headline was 'inappropriate' and says he wasn't surprised at the reaction... But
offered the chance to apologise... Thompson declined, dismissing the idea with the
words, 'We've dealt with it'."
Another article, on page two, also carried no byline, though Hunt told North & South
he wrote it and stood by its claims. The headline ran: "Citizen grows; Press grows
concerned". The story outlined changes to the Citizen -- including the name change
from Citizen Today to Christchurch Citizen, to reflect the paper's local orientation
-- and drew acerbic contrasts between the Press and the Citizen. The Press was "owned
by a man who left Australasia to set up home in the US [Rupert Murdoch], while the
Citizen's owner, Jim McCotter, had "moved from the United States to settle here,
injecting significant amounts of cash into the Christchurch economy". The Citizen
was a "modern paper for a modern city", while the Press was a "media dinosaur, struggling
to keep up" which had "resorted to old-fashioned bullying tactics".
"We just want a straightforward fight over who provides you... with the sharpest
news, the best stories, the most colourful sports coverage. They'd rather run and
hide behind their big corporate parent, and hope that Mr Billionaire Murdoch gives
them enough money to see off the Citizen."
Beneath this, a shorter article "Phone faux-pas" pilloried the Press for allegedly
not contacting the Citizen for comment on a story about the paper: "Reporters at
the Press may face retraining after apparently forgetting how to use the telephone."
All three articles appeared in the local news section.
Fighting talk indeed but it seems the no-holds-barred attack backfired in some quarters.
Newstalk ZB's Mike Yardley said talkback callers "thought it was petty [and the Citizen
was] playing tabloid games".
Paul Thompson refused to be drawn. Stolidly non-committal, he told this reporter
much what he told National Radio's Mediawatch in December: he would answer to his
readers, but not to the Citizen. "We broke the story... we wrote a headline which
some readers found offensive, which I felt was ambiguous, and the next day we said
it gave the wrong impression. From my point of view this is not about anyone else
except our newspaper responding to our readers." And the other attacks on the Press?
Thompson's diplomatic skirting faltered for a second. "That's just self-serving puffery."
Meanwhile, Lammers was dismayed. "I got calls from the media, asking what the hell
I was doing, then I had to explain to everyone I had nothing to do with it any more."
At the time of writing, Lammers was suing NZMG for unfair dismissal and damage to
his reputation.
Most of the ex-Citizen staff North & South spoke to have since gained new jobs.
At least two are back at the Press, while Lammers started as editor of the Ashburton
Guardian in January and has employed two ex-Citizen staff Former staff and observers
remark on the smallness and closeness of the print media industry in Canterbury and
wonder at the long-term fallout from the Citizen's staff hiring then shedding.
Even as the Citizen was being pared down a new sister publication was on the brew.
The tabloid sized 32-page ES: Entertainment And Style magazine hit newsstands on
January 18 accompanied by much NZMG in-house fanfare. In a front page launch announcement
the Citizen trumpeted "Christchurch is the most stylish city in New Zealand. And
that's official" and quoted editor-in-chief Jonathan Hunt: "ES is a revolutionary
concept... shaking up the publishing world... written by a crack team of entertainment
and style gurus..." On page two a headline promised: "ES Magazine 'huge boost to
economy'."
In a complicated pricing arrangement ES cost just $1 when bought in combination
with Friday's Citizen "weekend edition" but was marked at a rather hopeful $4 when
bought separately any other day of the week. Proclaiming itself a "revolutionary...
Christchurch/International" magazine, ES is a rather self-congratulatory, insubstantial
mix of fashion, lifestyle, entertainment and food.
The very day the magazine that was "shaking up the publishing world" arrived, it
lost its editor. Denyse Saunders quit and her PA and sales consultant went with
her. In an email to business associates and editors nationally Saunders wrote: "Whilst
I am extremely proud of the Collector's Edition of ES, my position over the last
week became untenable -- that made it necessary for me to resign."
Saunders, now running her own events company, Denyse Saunders Ltd, declined comment
for this story. She had ended a five-month stint as editor of a Christchurch giveaway
magazine Metropol to start ES.
Jim McCotter's daughter Shannon Hunt was brought in as new editor of ES and, in
another family twist, Simon Hunt, Jonathan's brother, also fresh from England, became
production manager. Hunt's "editor's letter" in the second issue begins: "A band's
second album, they say, is always more importantthan the first. Just so with a magazine."
Direct mention of Saunders' departure was left to McCotter. His note below the editor's
letter lauds Saunders' contribution: "If she was on stage now I would give her a
standing
ovation". But, "while ES will continue to carry a certain Denyse influence it is
time for the magazine to move onwards and upwards". The cover price on the third
issue slid to $2.
Just how much does all this cost?
In an April 20 2001 National Business Review story Jim McCotter is quoted as describing
NZMG as a charitable trust aiming to use its assets and profits for the community.
All indications are that the Citizen is running at a substantial loss, which is
not unusual. New publications usually take at least three years to turn a profit
and Canterbury media personality and former newspaperman Phil Gifford suggests any
new Christchurch paper would need at least five or six years to make an impression
given the Press's strong hold.
Current losses must be significant. Advertising revenue is crucial for most newspapers.
Press general manager Don Churchill says his paper's rule of thumb is 75 per cent
of revenue from advertising and 25 per cent from sales.
By the time ES was launched, advertisers had mostly deserted its parent, the Citizen.
The paper's first few issues carried over 45 ads. The January 18 edition had eight
larger ads and six small classifieds. Of the first eight, five were part of a continuing
education spread, one was for a company owned by McCotter and one was a full-page
ad for Rick Armstrong Motors. An Armstrong Motors spokesman says its Citizenads
were part of a package deal that included CTV and another NZMG company, Billboards.
Several early Citizen advertisers contacted by North & South said they bought space
in the new paper as a gesture of support. Some companies stopped because the deal
was only short-term or their needs had changed. Satisfaction with rates and customer
response varied: some businesses said rates were "competitive", but one found them
"quite expensive".
Asked in January 2002 about the scantiness of Citizen advertising compared with
other Christchurch newspapers, Hunt said it wasn't his area, but, he ventured, "I
don't think we're dependent on advertising. You look at the great national newspapers
all over the world and they're not full of advertising. I mean if the Press wants
to look like a sort of freebie daily that is funded entirely by advertising then
that is up to it."
That leaves revenue from sales. In January 2002, when asked about circulation figures
Hunt said he would email them to North & South. None came.
Meanwhile, Hunt contacted North & South twice, accusing this reporter of "harassing"
his staff. Hunt's complaints and the language and tone he used echoed similar broadsides
levelled at Press journalists in the Citizen's November articles and two similarly
trenchant articles about the Press in December and January.
Christchurch retailers were somewhat more helpful about sales. Of eight contacted
mid-February, most reported they sold between none and five copies of the Citizen
per edition. An exception was Fresh Choice supermarket in the affluent suburb of
Merivale, which sells about 25 of 50 copies of the Citizen on Fridays when it's on
sale for $1 together with ES. ES seems to have made little impact in other outlets.
The Cashel Street branch of Whitcoulls stocked about 70 copies of the newspaper
and magazine combination on Fridays, compared to 15-20 of the paper alone. On average
the branch sold five copies of the Citizen over all three days. The same store generally
sold most of its 60-copy stock of the Press. BP Edgeware averaged two Citizen sales
a day compared to 115 Press sales.
Circulation figures were not freely available to staff, either, but several former
staff offered estimates. Two sources believed combined casual and subscription daily
sales hovered around 1000-1100 copies in November 2001. Another source indicated
the figure might have reached about 1600. Neither figure tallies with the 30,900
readership claim made on the Citizen's front pages in November 2001. Lammers says
McCotter
arrived at that total by multiplying the number of copies printed by three, on the
assumption each copy would be read by three people.
Ashburton printer and president of the Community Newspapers' Association Frank Veale
estimated a 10,000 copy run would cost roughly $5000 per edition to print. So, if
10,000 copies of the Citizen were printed three times a week, printing costs probably
totalled around $15,000 weekly. Another ex-Citizen employee believed the print run
was cut to about 2500 in early 2002.
Former media consultant for NZMG Bert Dunn says the initial print costing for ES
was $40,000 per issue. He says the plan was to distribute 21,000 free copies in
higher-income neighbourhoods for the first few months.
Staff are a major cost. An email from McCotter dated February 18 2002, with the
subject heading "Message from Jim to Staff", listed 51 addressees -- presumably
NZMG's staff list. When North & South contacted these people two were no longer with
the company. Several others were working in other arms of NZMG or part-time. But
this staff list, in terms of salary outgoings would still represent a significant
draw
on company finds.
North & South asked McCotter and Hunt how much money had been budgeted to set up
NZMG, the Citizen and ES, when they expected to start making a profit, and how much
revenue was incoming from advertising and sales? No reply was forthcoming.
What kind of businessman is Jim McCotter? Why did he come to New Zealand? Why plunge
into such a notoriously risky industry? And why Christchurch?
McCotter and his family's immigration status in New Zealand is not known. If he
has secured a long-term business visa to start up his Christchurch ventures he
would have had to submit a business plan with forecasting for three years and prove
he could support himself and his family for that time. After two years long-term
business visa-holders may apply for residency under the category of entrepreneur
provided their businesses meet certain conditions.
McCotter is described on the NZMG web site (currently under revision) as an "international
business leader and American entrepreneur [who] has started a number of innovative
companies". Nine are listed and among them are: two media-related companies, a software
company, two mountain resorts in Wyoming, an investment firm, and McCotter Aviation
-- based in Penrose, Colorado -- which advertises in the Citizen.
McCotter gave a Colorado address when registering several of his New Zealand companies
but not one of the editors of the state's five main newspapers contacted by North
& South had heard of him.
An internet search turned up more information about McCotter Aviation. According
to the December 2001 issue of internet aviation magazine AIN Online, in March 2001
McCotter Aviation purchased majority shares of Maverick Air Inc, which manufactures
a twin-engine personal jet in kitset form. Maverick Jet's internet site contains
a personal message from McCotter, mentioning a price tag of $US750,000 for the jet.
The AIN Online article says seven kits had been sold by December 2001.
McCotter's earliest publishing experience seems to have been linked to his founding
role in a campus-based "born again" Christian movement stemming from Colorado in
the early 1970s. The movement has since evolved into an association of evangelical
churches in the United States and 20 other countries, dubbed the Great Commission
Association of Churches. (A spokesperson for the organisation confirmed McCotter
first formalised the movement, then called the Great Commission International, in
1983. He abandoned his leadership role in 1986.)
In the 1970s, McCotter was involved in publishing a Christian circular Today's Student
for the church movement. According to Larry Pile, a former church member now living
in Ohio, the paper folded in the early 1980s after failing to attract sufficient
advertising or financial backing.
Reports in two Florida newspapers reveal more about McCotter's media experience.
A June 1988 story in Central Florida Business and a January 1991 story in The Weekly
outlines McCotter's 1987 purchase of news programme distributor Florida Radio Network.
In March 1988, McCotter and a partner agreed to buy for $250,000 60 per cent of shares
in another radio programme syndicator, Sun Radio Network. Three months later, the
Sun seller took McCotter and his partner to court alleging they diverted assets
to the Florida Network and failed to make payments on Sun Radio's debts. In a counter-suit
McCotter alleged the seller misrepresented the network's finances. The outcome of
this litigation is not known.
The 1991 Weekly article also recounts the downfall of a tabloid community paper
chain that McCotter bought in October 1989. In four months the Orlando, Florida-based
Sun Newspapers Group expanded from one to 18 community editions. The group folded
in December 1990 after mass lay-offs and the collapse of a buy-out deal.
Parallels between the Sun and the Citizen stories are striking. Both raised local
eyebrows in terms of their timing -- the United States was going through a newspaper
industry recession in the late 1980s. In New Zealand the most recent newcomers to
the New Zealand newspaper scene, NZ News' the Auckland Sun, and Horton Media's Manukau
Daily News (later the Daily News), had both folded within a year of their respective
launches (the Sun in July 1988 and the Daily News in 1999).
The editorial quality of the McCotter papers was questioned by media experts in
both the US and New Zealand, and both the Sun and the Citizen printed highly critical
stories about their main competitors (the Orlando Sentinel and the Press), accusing
them of liberal and biased reporting.
Staff quoted in the US article echo Lammers when they mention McCotter's attempts
to influence content -- though, as with the Citizen, this influence was not regarded
as all-pervasive. In the Citizen's case, former editor Coen Lammers was conscious
of rumours sparked by stories in other New Zealand media that sketched McCotter's
and Botkin's alleged right-wing or religious backgrounds. The stories focussedon
Botkin's campaigning on Christian home schooling in the US and McCotter's membership
of US policy group Council for National Policy. "When I was there," says Lammers,
"we managed to keep every right wing and/or religious hint out of the paper." Now
Lammers has gone there is still no evidence of a clear right wing bias.
Both the Orlando and Christchurch papers underwent major restructuring, with reshuffling
at management level and lay-offs in their first few months. Finally, in both cases
McCotter was quick to expand.
Jonathan Hunt did not divulge to North & South NZMG's expansion plans, but Christchurch's
West Media Group chairman and CEO John McEwen says McCotter approached him about
buying Now TV, CTV's main competitor, on two occasions.
Trevor Laplanche, the director of Christchurch publishing firm Metros, says McCotter
also mentioned possible plans for a radio station when he approached Laplanche early
in 2001. Certainly, the concept of media convergence -- where different media outlets
owned by the same company overlap content, staff advertising and market -- is a big
theme for NZMG which owns internet and billboard companies as well as CTV and the
Citizen.
Fourteen companies registered in 10 months suggest a broad long-term vision. Again,
without any clarification from McCotter or his partners, we can only speculate what
this may be.
McCotter admits he chose Christchurch because of the possibility of purchasing CTV.
The official line, in a June NZMG press release, is that four things recommended
Christchurch: its highly-regarded computer industry; the fact "Christchurch people
seem receptive to new ideas and technologies" and its amenities and the recreational
activities on hand. Others conjecture it may have something to do with the fact
that New Zealand is one of the few places in the English-speaking world where you
can legally own both a television station and a newspaper in the same market. In
the United States this is illegal.
Meanwhile, Citizen sources say an air of anxiety, insecurity and confusion lingers
post-restructuring. Yet still the paper continues to arrive on shop newsstands and
in subscribers' homes three times a week. McCotter appointed Jonathan Hunt as new
CEO for NZMG in February, and the paper has wooed back several former staff.
This David is not lying down at its Goliath's feet.
As this story was going to print, the Citizen made a fresh attack on INL. Front
and page three headlines on March 1 screamed "Murdoch bully-boys to sue ES magazine",
and "Murdoch goes after ES mag". "Media magnate Rupert Murdoch's bullyboys are targeting
Christchurch and the new, successful lifestyle and entertainment magazine, ES",
began the story. The main claim was that INL lawyers had begun action to sue NZMG
for infringement of the INL TV Guide trademark, which appears four times down the
edge of the ES cover.
The article put it this way: "[the INL] lawyers seem to be accusing the people of
Christchurch of stupidity, implying readers here might confuse Murdoch's small,
cheap-looking product with the large-format glossy ES magazine, just because ES
has the generic words TV Guide printed on its front cover."
Jonathan Hunt exhorted readers to "support our new campaign to convince Rupert Murdoch
and his henchmen that we're not stupid down here in the South Island... write to
either the INL lawyers, or to Paul Thompson". He offered sample letters and gave
contact details for Thompson and INL company secretary and legal counsel Sarah Hard.
When North & South spoke to Hard that afternoon, she had received several emails
from Citizen readers. In a fax, she said: "I find it extraordinary that the Citizen
should name me (or anyone else at INL) as a 'bullyboy', and I am frankly appalled
the newspaper should encourage its readers to write or phone me to convey abuse."
She forwarded this magazine copies of two letters to NZMG which, presumably, triggered
the article. The first, dated July 24, 2001, noted that the Citizen was using "TV
Guide" as a heading for its television listings, pointed out it was an INL trademark
and asked NZMG to "Please make the necessary changes immediately."
The second, dated February 4, 2002, repeated the demand with respect to the ES cover,
closing "Please desist immediately or we will be forced to instruct our solicitors
to issue proceedings." Hard said at that date no proceedings had been issued by INL.
The lines are drawn, the battle proceeds, but just where this quirky and expensive
war of words and Christchurch readers will end is anybody's guess. Clearly a matter
of watching that space.
FOOTNOTE: As this story went to print some emailed responses were received from
Jim McCotter. Many questions remained unanswered, but McCotter did respond to the
following:
Why Christ church? "...the deregulated media market in New Zealand presented an
opportunity that may not have been achievable elsewhere. Also, Rupert Murdoch has
a monopoly in the Christchurch market which needs some competition.
What he says about the Council for National Policy: "...most in the Republican Party...
would consider it an honour to havea leadership role in CNP".
When asked about his involvement in a US campus-based evangelical movement in the
early 1970s, and the Great Commission International, renamed the Great Commission
Association of Churches, he said: "I personally grew up as a Protestant and have
tried to contribute most of my life to Christian or charitable organisations. However,
I am not remotely involved in any way, in any "Church Movement" as you suggest,
although I do go to church."
He confirmed past ownership of the businesses below, but did not expand on his current
involvement: Media Management Group, Smart Software, Big Horn Mountain Ski Resort,
Wyoming Mountain Reports, McCotter Capital Group, BJR Investments, Media Net, Gold
Eagle Construction, McCotter Aviation, Profit Group Corporation, Capital Advancement Inc,
American Investments, Destiny Film Productions, Florida Media Broadcasters
His Citizen
role?: "When I have been there I have functioned basically as a CEO."
His response to one claim that he once considered closing the Christchurch Citizen:
"No, sorry, we're growing stronger now every day."
How would you describe the Citizen's relations with the Christchurch Press?
"Well, I'd like to buy them if they would sell, or it may be a long war."
Circulation figures?: "Citizen, Approximately 29,500 copies going to hand per week;
ES Magazine 21,000 copies per week going to hand."
Expansion plans?: "There isn't anything we wouldn't like to do in continuing to
expand our coverage and penetration for our advertisers. We are growing faster than
any media group I personally know of."
NEWSFLASH: On March 11 the New Zealand Media Group, owners of the Christchurch Citizen,
ES magazine and CTV announced the company's sale to an undisclosed American media
group.
GCx Web Library
Resources on the Great Commission church movement
aka Great Commission Churches, Great Commission Ministries, Great Commission Association of Churches, Great Commission International, Great Commission Students, The Blitz Movement
Resources on the Great Commission church movement
aka Great Commission Churches, Great Commission Ministries, Great Commission Association of Churches, Great Commission International, Great Commission Students, The Blitz Movement
North & South (New Zealand), April 2002